GBC Admits Defeat Against The Final Order
Back To Prabhupada, Issue 4, Summer 2004
In 1995, the GBC in their wisdom decided to issue a definitive document on the Guru issue for ISKCON titled: âGurus and Initiation in ISKCONâ (GBC, 1995), [henceforward to be referred to as GII]. Part of this document was a paper entitled âOn My Order Understoodâ, in which the GBC attempted to explain once and for all what Srila Prabhupadaâs orders were for how initiations in ISKCON would continue after his physical departure. The GBC said of this paper:
âThe GBC approves of the paper entitled âOn My Order Understoodâ which establishes as ISKCON law the final siddhanta on Srila Prabhupadaâs desire for continuing the disciplic succession after the departure of His Divine Grace.â
[See Part II: GBC Position Papers in this volume.] (GII, p.1)
As can be seen the GBC were so confident of their paper that they used redundant English by stating it offered the âfinal siddhantaâ. A siddhanta or conclusion is by definition always final!
âThe Final Orderâ (TFO), the definitive position paper of the IRM documenting Srila Prabhupadaâs position as the Diksa Guru for ISKCON, was written specifically in response to the above GBC paper, taking it as its reference point. As TFO itself states in its very SECOND sentence:
âAlthough we will refer to several papers and articles that have been published by senior ISKCON devotees on this subject, the main points of reference will be the GBCâs most recent official handbook on initiation entitled. âGurus And Initiation In ISKCONâ (to be referred to henceforward as GII), and the paper âOn My Order Understoodâ which is mentioned under section 1.1 of the âLaws of ISKCONâ.â
(âThe Final Order, Introduction, 1996)
TFO then goes on to dismantle the arguments put forward in GII.
After 8 long years, the GBC have finally admitted that their so-called âfinal siddhantaâ paper, the main target of TFOâs attack, was not only not final, but completely bogus, as the following resolution passed this year at the GBC meetings states:
409. Continuing the Disciplic Succession [Statement]
WHEREAS:
The paper âOn My Order Understoodâ contains assumptions and assertions that, in numerous places, do not match the available evidence from the statements of Srila Prabhupada, And the GBC desires to make a more concise statement,
RESOLVED:
âOn My Order-Understoodâ is replaced as official GBC policy by the following statement:
The GBC officially accepts the following conclusions about continuing the disciplic succession:
Srila Prabhupada consistently said that his disciples would themselves become spiritual masters.
Guru, sadhu, and sastra all support this standard way of continuing the disciplic succession. Srila Prabhupada said that his disciples would become âregular Gurusâ and that each of their disciples would thus be a âdisciple of my disciple.â On the strength of our Vaisnava tradition and the statements of Srila Prabhupada, the GBC concludes that Srila Prabhupada intended his disciples to become âregular Gurusâ after he physically departed.
[GBC Resolution 409, 2004]
In addition, whilst submitting the reasons for ditching their official paper, Sivarama and Jayadvaita Swamis, the persons behind the resolution, actually state that this final Siddhanta GBC paper contains âliesâ, and that it âstretches the truth and contains poor logicâ.
As we can see from the above resolution, whilst admitting that their paper is basically a fabrication, the GBC are happy to re-state the same conclusions, only this time with no fabricated quotes from Srila Prabhupada to support their position. Rather they rest their whole philosophical position on just one piece of evidence:
An allusion to one line which Srila Prabhupada speaks on a tape, and which does not even say what they claim. Srila Prabhupada states on May 28th, 1977 the following:
âWhen I order you become Guru, he becomes regular Guru. Thatâs all. He becomes disciple of my disciple.â
Srila Prabhupada here clearly states that Gurus will emerge only WHEN he gives an order to that effect
- âWhen I order you become Guruâ â and as the GBC seem now to concede, such an order was never given. For this reason the GBC have had to fabricate the following account:
âSrila Prabhupada said that his disciples would become âregular Gurusâ and that each of their disciples would thus be a âdisciple of my disciple.â
Please spot the huge difference between what Srila Prabhupada actually says and the GBC fabrication. Srila Prabhupada does NOT say that his disciples âWOULD BECOME regular Gurusâ. He states that only WHEN he orders them to become Guru, do they become Guru, not that they WOULD become Guru.
And the authors of this latest GBC resolution have the cheek to say the paper it replaces contained - âassertions that, in numerous places, do not match the available evidence from the statements of Srila Prabhupadaâ, yet we see their latest effort is no better.
In ditching their âfinal siddhantaâ paper the GBC have effectively admitted that âThe arguments and evidence which we put forward to reach our conclusion were completely wrong, and we are not offering any alternative argument or evidence, but we still want to say that the conclusion â that we be allowed to operate a Guru program replacing Srila Prabhupada â is correct.â
Thus the GBCâs programme is simply to be âGurus at all costsâ. First they tried to do it by instituting the Guru Hoax part 1 â the zonal acarya system. When that failed they tried Guru Hoax part 2 â the everyone and anyone can be Guru programme â justified by the now discarded âOn My Order Understoodâ paper. This continual changing of position papers to try and keep the âGuru businessâ on the road was thoroughly condemned by Srila Prabhupada:
**âSo these rascals will change every year their theologyâ.
**_(Srila Prabhupada, morning walk, LA 21/12/73)_Subscribe for FREE to Back To Prabhupada Magazine - Click Here
Please chant: Hare Krishna, Hare Krishna, Krishna, Krishna, Hare, Hare,
Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama, Rama, Hare, Hare. And be Happy!

